These articles, for the most part, struck me as surprisingly
true and applicable to my life. Social media is this new beast that effects
each and every one of our lives but very few have a complete understanding of
in what ways. To me, these articles show the positive use of social media and
how it can be used to create connections outside of our physical locations.
Thoughts and feelings can be shared back and forth with others that you have
never seen but can begin to create meaningful relationships with. I think social
media provides a way for those who feel unheard and inadequate to participate in
more formal discourse communities, to create community of their own, to find
identity and meaning in others through a way that they feel confident in
expressing themselves. Social media, like I said, is this new sector of all of
our lives, untapped, for the most part, by social norms. This leaves room for
exploration and expression, which in my mind creates movements like “#whyIstayed”
and gives people the chance to hear and be heard. With this new way of creating connections and
relationships there is an aspect of anonymity, as the author of “Why I Didn’t
Post this Photo to Facebook” post discusses, we can be whoever we want to be
and have complete control over what is posted and in some aspects what ideas
can be taken from our posts about who we are and what our lives are like. This
is a dangerous power to have. It then creates this gap between reality and the
socially perceived reality that we present on social media.
In the context of writing and community’s Harris states, “Abstracted
as they are from almost all other kinds of social and material relations, only
an affinity of beliefs and purposes, consensus, is left to hold such
communities together.” To me this indicates that social communities are some of
the most raw and vulnerable types of communities. Let me explain how I came to
this conclusion. First of all, even though there is a negative side to the anonymity
factor social media provides, it also allows people to freely share their
thoughts and ideas without being judged based on their outward physical
appearance. Readers or members of the community then understand the person for
their thoughts rather than their appearance and connect based on shared
feelings or thoughts verses preconceived notions due to one’s appearance.
Second of all, people are more likely to share thoughts that are deeply
intimate to them. Without necessarily having to put a face to a post there is a
stronger likelihood that writers might be apt to being more vulnerable than
they would in a face to face conversation.
I think social media also provides a way for students to express themselves
outside of the defined realm of conversations and interactions that academics
set before us. These unspoken and sometimes spoken standards of discourse are
shattered on social media. Writers are given the ability to freely think and
play with ideas without having to fit them into a predefined box. “…to define
their views against some ‘common’ way of talking about their subject. Instead,
they simply repeat in their writing ‘what everybody knows’ or what their
professor has told them in her lectures.”
These three articles have shown how people use the internet
and different forms of social media, blogging, Twitter, and Facebook to create
common connections through conversations that reveals their thoughts and ideas.
The flow of communication back and forth creates relationships that can not be
denied their power and validity to make a difference.
You raise some really interesting points here! I am particularly interested your point about social media being relatively "untapped by social norms." In many ways, I think you're right, we can make an argument that places like Facebook and Twitter as relatively new sites of discourse have fairly unstructured conventions as of yet. However, I also think much of what we do online is constrained and created by what we do and say in "real life." There also seems to be a series of developing discourse conventions for particular social media sites and discourse communities. For example,The point Ruddy makes in her article about not posting disingenuous photos of our lives speaks to the discourse conventions of Facebook – – that being the conventions of posting only happy or well-crafted photos on Facebook.
ReplyDeleteI also think the idea of anonymity is really interesting. I hadn't thought of the ways in which someone can be anonymous on social media sense many people seem to use it as a way to fine-tune or create particular identities for themselves rather then hide.however I think you're right people find some power in being able to say things online that they couldn't say to someone's face. In what ways do you see this as useful and beneficial and what ways do you see it as potentially dangerous? Are there discourses of anonymity or particular discourse conventions of anonymity on social media?